(click here for Tunaley Debtors, Insolvencies and Bankruptcies)
Court Cases 0f 1857
There were two Chancery court cases in 1857:
(1) Chancery: Tunaley vs Roch, April 27th 1857 (click here for details).
The issue here was that, in her will, Constantia, the mother, left all her estate to daughter Constantia Maria, leaving out her two sons as beneficiaries.
Perhaps significantly, as far as the two sons were oncerned, the will was made out 16 May 1854, only a few days before Constantia died (Constantia buried Duffield, 10 June 1854).
Prelude to the above case: Robert Tunaley, Constantia’s husband had died 1820 leaving a will that suggested or was interpreted as such by Constantia that all his estate would go to Constantia on the proviso that the 3 children by Robert’s second marriage to Constantia survived beyond the age of 21 years.
This case was a challenge (Tunaley vs. Roch) to that will.
the will of Robert Tunaley (deceased husband of Constantia) concluded that Robert had effectively left his property in Constantia's trust for the three children
survival. As a result, property that consisted of 3 dwelling houses in Full Street (parish of all Saints) and one in the parish of St. Werburgh’s together with
all outbuildings was to be split equally between Constantia Maria Roch, who by then was a widow, and Robert’s two other children.
(2) The following case of August 5th 1857 was a sequel to the case of April 27th 1857
"Chancery: Tunaley vs Roch and Tunaley, August 5th 1857"
(click here for full details of the case as published in the London Gazette August 7th 1857
Thomas Snape Tunaley died 17th April, 1855, Wigginton, Tamworth (cause of death pulmonary phthisis (a form of T.B.), leaving widow Catharine and
young daughter Kathleen Constantia Tunaley, born 1852.
which, acording to the will, it was to be passed on to daughter Kathleen Constantia Tunaley.
One of several problems was that the late Robert Tunaley's estate was tied up in property and, in accordance with the first Chancery hearing, was
to be shared in equal amounts between the various beneficiaries. And thus any sale would have required the agreement of all joint owners or, as the case may
have been, "tenants in common" (persons each owning a share of the property).
The Chancery case refers to “An Act to Facilitate Leases and Sales of Settled Estates”.
This Act of 1856 allowed the Chancery to overide common law and provide special dispensation as in cases such as this where the estate had already
been settled following the first Chancery hearing but where there remained a problem involving the distribution of the estate and any children of the
Catherine was confirmed as executor of husband Thomas’s third share of the estate with proceeds to go into trust for the benefit of Kathleen.
NB: Documents shown on this website give Robert James Tunaley as “Plaintiff” and other parties as “Defendants”. Yet these were not criminal
court cases and today, the correct terminology would have been “Petitioner” and “Respondent”. Indeed Robert James Tunaley was probably
the only person in the family of sufficient wealth to take these cases to the Chancery.
Transcript of Thomas Snape Tunaley’s Will at:
(Copy of original Will document kindly provided by Dr. Jane Holmes)